“I have to ask,” he said. “What matters more to you—getting the money quickly or making sure your sisters share the legal consequences?”
I thought about the way Victoria had smirked when she showed off her wedding photos, how Ashley had once thrown a fit because her manicure chipped the day before her engagement party and Mom had rushed to fix it like it was a medical emergency.
“They both knew,” I said. “They got the weddings. They saw the bank transfers. They joked about it. They watched my college plans vanish like they were nothing. They can share the fallout.”
“That means we go to trial,” he said.
“Then we go to trial,” I said.
Trial was set for March. I started community college in January using what was left of my trust plus the rest of my savings. I moved into my friend Kyle’s spare room because there was no way I was staying under the same roof as people who were preparing a legal defense for robbing me.
“Dude, are you sure about this?” Kyle asked the night I carried my duffle bag in. “Suing your parents? That’s… intense.”
“They sued me first,” I said.
He frowned. “Pretty sure that’s not how this works.”
“They sued my future,” I said. “Close enough.”
He let it go after that.
The weeks leading up to trial were a blur of school, night shifts at the auto-parts store, weekend shifts at a mechanic’s shop, and meetings at Patterson’s office. He prepped me for my testimony like it was an exam.
“Don’t answer what they didn’t ask,” he said. “If the question is yes or no, answer yes or no. If you need to explain, do it briefly. Don’t let them bait you into an emotional outburst. The facts are on your side. That’s all you need.”
“What if I get mad?” I asked.
“Then remember that every word you say becomes part of a permanent record,” he said. “And that the judge doesn’t care how you feel. She cares what the documents say and whether the law was followed.”
The morning of trial, I put on the only suit I owned—navy blue, bought on clearance for a cousin’s graduation. The courthouse smelled like old paper and coffee. The ceiling felt too high, the benches too hard.
Judge Harrison was in her early sixties, gray hair pulled back, glasses low on her nose. She had the kind of presence that made everyone sit a little straighter.
Patterson gave our opening statement without drama, just steady facts. He described the trust, the terms, the withdrawals, the messages. Every sentence felt like another bolt tightened in place.
My parents’ attorney tried the “family” angle. He talked about sacrifice, about “supporting children at key life milestones,” about cultural expectations of weddings. He said the word forgiveness more times than he said trust.
Judge Harrison stopped him at one point.
“Counselor,” she said, “are you arguing that weddings and real-estate purchases fall under the definition of ‘post-secondary education expenses’ as written in this trust?”
“In a broader sense of life education and—”
“Answer the question,” she said.
He swallowed. “No, Your Honor.”
“Then proceed,” she said.
When it was my turn to testify, my hands shook for the first two questions. Then something in me clicked, the same way it did when I finally understood how all the parts of an engine fit together.
I told the story. Not with dramatic flourishes, just in order.
I talked about Grandpa’s garage and the way he explained engines. I talked about hearing the words trust fund as a kid and how every adult who mentioned it said things like Don’t worry, you’ll be taken care of. I explained my spreadsheets and my plans for state school, the expectation that this money existed to help me earn a degree that would change my life.
I described the birthday dinner—Mom’s lasagna, Dad’s folder, the way they said words like difficult decisions and family sacrifices while putting a dollar figure on exactly how little my future meant to them.
I watched the judge’s face change when I described the texts.
He’s only fifteen, he won’t even know.
Can we use some of Finn’s fund?
I’ll pay him back eventually.
During cross-examination, my parents’ attorney tried to make me sound vindictive.
“You’re asking this court to strip your parents and sisters of significant assets,” he said. “Isn’t that right?”
“I’m asking the court to make them return what they stole,” I said.
“Have your parents ever failed to put a roof over your head?” he asked. “Food on the table? Clothes on your back?”
“This isn’t about a roof or food or clothes,” I said. “This is about $134,000 that was meant for my education. They used it for weddings and real estate. That’s what this is about.”
“Do you love your parents?” he asked suddenly.
Patterson started to object, but Judge Harrison held up a hand, curious.
I thought about the question.
“I loved the people I thought they were,” I said finally. “The people I thought they were wouldn’t have done this.”
He dropped that line of questioning quickly after that.
Day two belonged to my parents, mostly.
Dad talked about “pressure” and “expectations” and “keeping up appearances” because of his job. Patterson calmly walked him through financial records showing club memberships, leased luxury cars, vacations.
“If things were so tight that you had to raid an education trust,” he asked, “why did you continue these discretionary expenses?”
Dad stammered something about networking. It sounded thin in the echo of the courtroom.
Mom cried. She described me as “distant,” as if my failure to fawn over her justified the theft.
“I always thought he was so smart and resourceful,” she said. “I thought he’d understand later. I thought he’d forgive us. I never meant to hurt him.”
Patterson didn’t go after her as hard. I noticed that. He still pinned down the essential facts.
“You read the trust documents,” he said. “You knew the words ‘exclusively for post-secondary education’ were there.”
“Yes,” she said softly.
“And you signed off on using those funds for expenses that had nothing to do with education.”
“Yes,” she whispered.
My sisters didn’t even take the stand. Their attorney announced they’d be invoking their Fifth Amendment rights due to potential criminal exposure.
The judge raised her eyebrows.
“In a civil trust case?” she asked.
“Yes, Your Honor,” their lawyer said.
“Noted,” she said dryly.
It didn’t look good for them.
On the last day, Patterson delivered a closing statement that felt like the final tightening of every screw.
“The law is very clear,” he said. “A trustee must follow the terms of the trust. These terms were not vague. They were not flexible. They were explicit. Funds exclusively for education. The defendants treated that trust like a personal slush fund, assuming their son would either never notice or never fight back. He noticed. He fought back. Now it is this court’s responsibility to enforce the trust as written and to ensure that there are consequences for breach.”
My parents’ lawyer tried to lean on emotion.
“This is a family,” he said. “A son and his parents, two sisters. They are asking you to make a ruling that will fracture them permanently.”
“The fracture occurred when the trust was violated,” the judge said quietly. “Not today.”
She took the case under advisement, said she’d issue a written decision within two weeks.
Those two weeks crawled.
I went to class. I went to work. I learned how to use a lathe in my machining lab. I changed brakes in the shop on weekends. Every time my phone buzzed, my heart skipped a beat.
Finally, on a Thursday afternoon, Patterson called.
“Judge Harrison issued her ruling,” he said. “You free to talk?”
I sat in my car in the parking lot of the community-college campus, hands gripping the steering wheel.
“Yes,” I said.
“We won,” he said. “Full judgment. $134,000 in actual damages—the amount that should have been in your trust—plus $45,000 in punitive damages and $28,000 in legal fees. Total judgment: $207,000.”
My vision blurred for a second.
“Your parents and sisters are jointly and severally liable for portions of that judgment,” he continued. “Your parents cover the majority. Your sisters are on the hook for the portion that directly funded their weddings and down payments—that totals $89,000. They have sixty days to pay or we begin enforcement: wage garnishment, liens, you know the drill.”
I laughed once, a sharp sound that was more exhale than humor.
“Thank you,” I said.
“You did the hard part,” he said. “You walked into court and told the truth.”
The fallout came fast after that.
My parents filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy, hoping to wrap the judgment into a repayment plan. The bankruptcy trustee looked at their assets and debts and determined what would have to go. The house was the big one.
They’d bought it fifteen years earlier for $320,000, refinanced it twice, still owed around $180,000. The market was hot. It sold for $385,000 in less than a month.
After the mortgage, realtor fees, and closing costs, they cleared around $185,000.
From that, my judgment got priority. With the punitive damages and fees folded in, plus interest and costs, the total climbed a bit, but between the house sale and liquidation of other assets—a couple of retirement accounts, some investments, Dad’s beloved stock options—they managed to satisfy the judgment in a single, brutal sweep.
They walked away from the house with basically nothing.
Dad’s leased BMW went back to the dealer. Mom’s SUV disappeared from the driveway. They moved into a two-bedroom apartment in a complex off a busy road, the kind with peeling paint and kids’ bikes chained to railings.
My sisters tried to fight their part of the judgment separately.
Victoria filed a motion claiming undue hardship, explaining that being forced to pay would require her to sell her condo and might “negatively impact her mental health.” The judge was unmoved.
“Many people experience hardship,” she wrote in the ruling. “The hardship here stems from your own active participation in the misuse of your brother’s education funds. The judgment stands.”
Ashley tried again to argue ignorance, saying she “didn’t fully understand” where the money was coming from.
Patterson responded by submitting the texts again.
Can we use some of Finn’s fund?
There’s only so far you can run from your own words when they’re printed in black and white with timestamps.
In the end, both of them sold their condos. Victoria’s sale turned a small profit. Ashley’s barely broke even. They moved into a shared rental and began making monthly payments under a court-structured plan.
The social fallout was messier, less quantifiable but just as satisfying.
See more on the next page
Advertisement
